Text Size:

Shrink TextEnlarge Text

Text Only Site:

Text Only Site

Contrast:

Contrast

How accurate are worm tests?

How accurate are equine worm tests?

The faecal  worm egg count is a common procedure for investigating intestinal parasitism in  horses.

A sample  of faeces is taken, suspended in liquid and the eggs in a small amount of the liquid  are counted. Unless the worm eggs are distributed evenly throughout the faeces,  then the result may not accurately reflect the egg output of the horse as a whole.

Matthew Denwood, working in the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Glasgow has been looking at the factors that affect  this variation in accuracy.

 Horse Dung - How accurate are worm tests?

Five stabled  horses were tested over a week. Faeces samples were collected morning and afternoon .

A McMaster  slide was used for counting the eggs. Normally the result is calculated after  counting the eggs in only one or two chambers. For this study, Denwood recorded  the eggs present in ten chambers.

Two horses  were also tested more intensively. A single faecal ball and a faecal pat were each  tested five times.

Denwood found  considerable variation between tests on the same horse. For example, one animal  gave counts ranging from 100 eggs per gram (epg) to 850epg (average 454epg) from  the same pile of faeces.  If only a single test had been used to determine if the  egg count were high enough to require anthelmintic treatment, it would have been  wrong 25% of the time.

Although  he did not specifically test for changes in worm egg count throughout the day  ( there were not enough samples) he found no evidence to suggest there was a diurnal  variation.

Most of the  variability (around 74%) was due to differences between animals. Differences between samples  (from the same horse) accounted for around 13% of the variation. The counting process  itself was responsible for only around 4% of the variability - when the result was based  on counting10 McMaster chambers. However this rose to around 11% when only one chamber  was counted.

Denwood concludes  that repeatability of faecal egg count tests appears to be poor because of variability between animals and between samples .

How can you  make the faecal egg count more closely reflect the actual worm egg output of the  horse? He suggests counting more chambers and reducing the variability of the sample  by including more homogenised faeces in the sample examined.

Source: British Equine Veterinary Association Congress. Liverpool. September 2008

Reproduced with kind permission of Mark Andrews BVM&S CertEP MRCVS
© Copyright Mark Andrews  - Equine Science Update 2008

Related Articles:
StrongidTM-P advises on efficient and cost-effective worming
Advice about  Spring Worming
Autumn Worming
Foals: Getting a head start against worms
TAPEWORM-ASSOCIATED COLIC... IS YOUR HORSE AT RISK



Added on: 30/09/08.

Bookmark and Share Email this article to a friend or share

Voices for Horses offers news, articles and videos from third party providers unless otherwise stated. We do not necessarily endorse the views expressed or content and make it available to you only as a service. All news items, articles and videos are copyright of the authors, film makers and original publications.

<< Back to Advice and Information

Advertise With Us

Voices For Horses Site Sponsors - Advertise With Us Voices For Horses Site Sponsors - Advertise With Us Voices For Horses Site Sponsors - Advertise With Us Equestrian Directory Advertisers



© Voices For Horses 2007 - 08
Website created by Akira Studio Ltd
Hosted By LQD Internet Limited